College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students

Beating should be deemed hate crime

By John Stafford

Print this article

Published: Thursday, October 1, 2009

Updated: Thursday, October 1, 2009

DJ Bell received the news of his life Friday: not guilty on all charges. It took the 3rd District Court less than three hours to acquit Bell, who was charged with two counts of first-degree felony child-kidnapping and one count of second-degree felony burglary last July. The verdict marks a huge momentum swing in the case.

Bell was accused by Lulu Latu, his neighbor and mother of two children found at his home July 4. Bell said he had brought the children to sleep at his house, because there was a loud party at their house. The family interpreted this as kidnapping, and after reclaiming the children, some male family members arrived at the house, who beat up Bell and his gay partner.

The defense is now on the offensive, asking for charges to be filed against Bell’s vigilante attackers.

Openly gay Utah Sen. Scott McCoy called the district attorney’s handling of the case “disgraceful” and said, “We do have hate crimes in the state of Utah that are happening. We do have a law on the books to deal with it, but that doesn’t really matter if we don’t have law enforcement officials and prosecutors who are willing to recognize a hate crime when it happens, to investigate it as a hate crime and to prosecute it as a hate crime.”

After Bell’s acquittal, the DA’s office said it would look into filing charges against the people who assaulted Bell. The lack of evidence presented by the prosecution had some members of the jury wondering why the case had even come to trial in the first place. Juror Natasha Jorgensen said that she felt the trial had been a waste of time and $100,000 of taxpayers’ money.

The fact of the matter is that the prosecution failed to produce any eyewitnesses and had no evidence that Bell entered Latu’s house. The cornerstone of the case was a police interview where Bell allegedly said, “I took the children and I shouldn’t have taken them.” However, the validity of this statement as a confession was easily refuted by the defense. The traumatic head injury that Bell had just received—he still has hearing loss in his right ear—disqualified this statement as an admission of guilt.

Growing up, I experienced my fair share of concussions from skiing and playing lacrosse. During my last major one—I haven’t had one since high school, fortunately; knock on wood—I was asked in the hospital to identify my father. I could only see a complete stranger who for some reason was calling out an insignificant name: mine. That was from one blow sustained while I was wearing a helmet. Bell’s head was repeatedly slammed into the concrete. Bell’s attorneys claimed that the severity of his head injury made his confession involuntary and was therefore inadmissible evidence. The jury agreed.

The utter lack of any substantial evidence in this case suggests an ugly truth. Bell would have been more likely considered a victim rather than a kidnapper had he been heterosexual—or “normal,” as Utah Eagle Forum President Gayle Ruzicka would say. The case seemed to hinge on one unfortunate misconception: gay equals pedophile.

I’ll admit when I initially heard that Bell was quoted as saying “You are so beautiful,” to the children I found it to be a bit disturbing. Luckily, I quickly caught myself and acknowledged my error. I’ve often heard my mother say those exact words to young children. I realized that I had judged this man prematurely, based solely on his sexual orientation.

This notion has been ingrained into our psyche to the extent that it has become a subconscious reflex. This is why many assumed Bell was a kidnapper, why he was arrested, why he and his partner were beaten profusely and why nothing has been done about it. Authorities had not discussed charging the vigilantes seriously until Bell’s acquittal. To them, he was guilty until proven innocent.

The beatings of DJ Bell and Dan Fair are too brutal and senseless to ignore, and the prosecution should try for an attempted murder conviction if charges are indeed filed. Because the assailants cut Bell’s throat repeatedly with a broken piece of glass, Bell should have a case.

Now that Bell can return to his day-to-day life, it seems that the scales of justice have started to tip back toward equilibrium. Once Bell’s assailants are charged with the heinous crime they committed and tried in a court of law, we might rekindle some sense of impartiality.

letters@chronicle.utah.edu
 

Comments

21 comments
Albert K. Alberts
Wed Oct 7 2009 13:13
To NOJ,

wow...........................

to Emmbee,

Interesting, I would bet I read a fair amount from many sources on this case, as I found it very interesting. Frankly, I think you and Stafford are blowing this out of proportion. Did they go and beat the two men because they were gay? NOPE! Therefore, not a hate crime.

Again, let me emphasize that these men (the ones who did the beating) should be thrown in jail. Beating someone is never the answer. I would give them a loooong sentance. I just don't see it as a hate crime.

Irritated
Tue Oct 6 2009 18:31
I don't care if those kids knocked on his door or let themselves into his home, he had NO legal right to allow them to stay there without notifying someone. When they knocked on his door at 6:00 a.m. he should have told them to go home, or called the parents or physically knocked on the parents door to say, "Hey your kids are wandering the streets." Bell could have called the police...anything would have been better than what he did. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that a 4 year old and a 2 year old have absolutely no business being in his home ALONE without their parents consent. It was wrong and sometimes when you make bad decisions you pay for them in painful ways. I would have personnally kicked his butt, and it has nothing to do with him being gay, women, man, old, young...it was not right for him to keep those kids under any circumstances...he was guilty.
Irritated
Tue Oct 6 2009 18:17
Where were the children? How did they get there? Why didn't he call the family to notify them? Why did he let them into his home in the first place? Why didn't he walk them back to their own home? Why would he let them sleep in his home when the parents didn't know where they were? Why why why why...too many unanswered questions. I don't care what you think, I think the guy is guilty of taking/keeping those kids without permission or acknowledgement of the parents...GUILTY!
Huey P. Newton
Tue Oct 6 2009 17:10
Irritated,

No, that didn't happen. If you'd have bothered to read ANYTHING about this case you would realize how stupid you just made yourself sound. This case should have never even made it to court. There was absolutely no evidence. We need a new D.A . . .

Irritated
Tue Oct 6 2009 14:49
Did the guy go into his neighbors home and remove 2 children without consent????? GUILTY!
Emmbee
Tue Oct 6 2009 03:02
Albert, are you too lazy to go read ANY of the news coverage of the case last week? If you did, you would see the reports that slurs and epithets were screamed during the beating issues to DJ Bell. Or can you just not read unless someone digests it and spits it back up again for you like a helpless baby bird?

Anyone you don't take seriously gets a vote of confidence.

Jeff
Tue Oct 6 2009 01:38
proven not guilty in court don't mean the guy didn't actually do it. Just ask O.J.
The N.O.J
Fri Oct 2 2009 22:37
jajaja Alberto, naci en D.F mexico wey. I happen to be what some small minded hijos de puta would call a beaner. I would never "downgrade" mi raza. I was merely mocking your offense. You seemed almost angry because I added harmless "O" to the end of your name. I have never taken pompous people like you seriously and don't plan to start anytime soon . So en conclusion, andate a la concha de tu bisabuela pinche gusano. Ademas mijo Albertito, I don't really care if it's over your head because the job of resurrector is to wake up the dead. te portes bien guey.

El vato mas conocido,
--Joselito

Albert K. Alberts
Fri Oct 2 2009 18:12
Oh I see, so you downgrade me by assuming I am a different race but the intolerance of homosexuals bothers you..........sorry NOJ, but I just took you off my list of people to be taken seriously on this board.
The N.O.J
Fri Oct 2 2009 17:53
Sorry alberto, didn't mean to lump you in with the illegal aliens. It's according to his roommates' accounts of the beating. I tried to post the link but it won't let me. probably thinks im spamming. google it. it was in the deseret news and city weekly.
Your name
Fri Oct 2 2009 16:40
Utah has an openly gay state senator? Is satan making snowballs yet?
Albert K. Alberts
Fri Oct 2 2009 16:39
my name is "Albert" not "Alberto".

Ok, can you give us a source please to the Deseret news article. Also, is this "alleged" or did it actually happen?

Good job, JS
Fri Oct 2 2009 12:40
I'm enjoying your opinion pieces, Stafford. Good work--keep it up.
The New Original Journalist
Thu Oct 1 2009 17:19
To my good friend alberto,

you got me, I'll admit when I'm wrong. I should have said, "according to an article in the Deseret News, DJ Bell's attackers shouted homophobic epithets while beating him and his partner."

Albert K. Alberts
Thu Oct 1 2009 16:21
To the writer,

Ahhh, its good to know I have some influence around here. I am glad you wrote this with me in my mind. Ha ha ha just kidding.

In all seriousness, this should not be labeled a hate crime. I honestly hope that the guys who beat them are thrown in jail. But this is not a hate crime.

To my good friend New Original,

really? you were there? you heard them? Did you call the police since you were there? I would be interested to know..........

The New Original Journalist
Thu Oct 1 2009 15:19
DJ Bell's attackers shouted homophobic epithets while they were beating him and his partner. This is obviously a hate crime and should be dealt with accordingly.
Trevor
Thu Oct 1 2009 13:13
I guess it could be a hate crime if you hate it when your children are taken without your knowledge to "sleep with them". Yeah, it was a knee jerk (over)reaction to beat those guys, but people tend to get sensitive with their children sleeping at strangers' homes - especially if they view them as sexual deviants - heightening the fear of sexual abuse. It may be the "neighborly" thing to do if you know the family well and have their permission, but it appears they did not and that makes it very inappropriate.
Furious
Thu Oct 1 2009 12:38
After the trial the D.A. said something about the reason Bell's assailants were not charged was because they didn't want to be charging both parties at the same time. One could argue that Bell's assailants are innocent until proven guilty, but they haven't even been charged with a crime. It was Bell that was charged with kidnapping, and nothing was done to go after the real perpetrators. I have to agree with John Stafford. Bell was guilty until proven innocent, at least by the D.A. and South Salt Lake police.
S
Thu Oct 1 2009 10:34
It seems as if no good deed goes unpunished. Mr. Bell probably should have phoned the police the moment those children turned up on his doorstep. Instead, he did the neighborly thing - something I would have done. For his efforts, he and his partner were brutally beaten. That sounds like a hate crime to me. Of course, that is just MHO
m
Thu Oct 1 2009 09:04
I have read the facts of this case and it does sound like a hate crime to me.






log out