College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Good education worth high textbook prices

By Tina Parsons

|

Published: Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Updated: Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Many factors can contribute to the high costs of textbooks. Years of extensive research, the collaboration efforts of many individuals and the intellectual investment from authors, experts, editors, researchers, reviewers and designers justify the pricing.

Experts in any given field are subject to years of costly education. Should these professionals decide to put their expertise forward in print and publish a textbook, they deserve to be compensated.

According to Susan Aspey, director of communications for Pearson Publishing, publishers are investing in innovative, integrated education solutions that increase learning and improve student success.

“For example, our MyLabs learning solutions, such as MyMathLab and MathXL, have helped millions of once-struggling students to achieve success at college-level math,” Aspey said.

Learning aids such as these cost time and money to develop. Because textbooks are limited in terms of scope and who uses them, the costs will accordingly and reasonably be placed on the user. However, new advances have made cutting costs for students readily available.

Pearson, for example, offers e-textbooks that are available at 50 percent off the print text price, as well as a range of course material options, such as three-hole punch editions, black-and-white books and custom texts, all designed to keep costs in line without shortchanging the author or publisher.

“The cost of textbooks is originated from the publisher,” said Shane Girton, associate director at the University Campus Store. “Bottom line, profit the store makes from the sale of textbooks is 4 percent that goes back to the university bond program.”

The U campus store has a markup of about 25 percent more than the publishers’ cost. The remaining 21 percent after the university bond program is used to pay its rent, loans and employees, as well as other operating costs.

This is a small price to pay, considering the university must pay its bonds. A 4 percent profit doesn’t qualify as greed.

In fact, the U is below the industry average on textbook price markups by approximately 2 percent. The store’s profit margin is also lower than the industry average by 2.3 percent, Girton said. This shows that the U campus store is doing what it can to provide quality education materials at the best possible prices.

Girton recommended buying used books and utilizing e-textbooks as a means to save money. He explained that used textbooks can save students up to 25 percent of the new cost, and e-textbooks can save students 40 to 50 percent. Many instructors on campus use custom publishing for their packets, and this saves students more than 80 percent on course materials, Girton said.

Instead of complaining about how much books are, look at everything you get out of them. Education would not be effective without these texts and would be even less effective if quality research, knowledge and expertise were sacrificed because of pricing issues.
We all have come to the U to get a quality education with the reasonable expectation that we can make an income above and beyond what we can without a degree. Authors and experts of textbooks should have this same expectation when they put their years of experience and knowledge to work in writing a textbook.

letters@chronicle.utah.edu

 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

5 comments

e pur si muove
Tue Oct 27 2009 21:59
I love it when people write non sequitor type stuff like "Economists have nothing to do with the message..." What? Sean, Sean, Sean. If you knew what economics was you wouldn't make this comment. You say economists have nothing to add to the conversation but then your comment proceeds as though it were an argument from economics. Make some sense (please!!).

Economics is the study of scarce resources which have alternative uses. Textbooks and everything that goes into them (thoughts, paper, transportation) constitute scarce resources. Why shouldn't an economist address this issue? Parsons says the high price is worth the output (what you get in return). Some say it's not, but they still pay the higher price (seems a little odd to say it's not worth the price but then to purchase it). The cost to the consumer it what someone else would pay for the book....

This is the kind of clarity economics brings to hasty conversations like these. THINK MY FREIND, THINK.

Albert K. Alberts
Tue Oct 27 2009 17:26
I Wonder what 21% of the revenue from books is........ a pretty darn good chunk of change... that I dare say would be a lot more than everything the author claims it goes to.
Sean Young
Tue Oct 27 2009 16:49
I agree with this article. Economists have nothing to do with the message that is being said here. I don't think either Albert nor Reality Check even read this article. She is stating that the cost is justifiable because of what goes into a textbook. If a professor chooses a sub par text isn't the issue. Most of the textbooks I have ever used have contained good information, I love the subjects where the professors publish their own custom packets, and I find these very informative as well.

I don't think you two even bother to look at what is being said in articles. You are just trying to be confrontational which is fine. However, your ignorance is showing.

Albert K. Alberts
Tue Oct 27 2009 15:10
I had a math book that the professors went out of their way to use because it was cheap. It was an awful book. Poorly written, poor examples, and very vague.

I agree with reality check, an economist, not a journalist should have written this. Better go check your facebook page to make sure that no one is invading things you voluntarily write Parsons

Reality Check
Tue Oct 27 2009 13:11
Uh, nice try. Textbooks cost so much because the person deciding which book to use is not the person paying for the book. In this case, it's professors who choose the book and students who have the buy it. This gives textbook publishers an inelastic market. Translation: whether textbooks cost a little or a lot, publishers still sell about the same number of books. So naturally, they charge the highest price they can. The result: Wealthy publishers win and poor students lose.

Next time, have an economist write this article.







log out